Author: Manpreet Kaur1, P.J.S. Pannu2, and Vikas Nath3
Author Address: 1Associate Professor, 2Research Scholar, and Director, Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Management and Research, A-4, Paschim Vihar, Rohtak Road, New Delhi-110063
Keywords: Arms trade, defence, indigenization, military expenditure, research and development.
JEL Codes: F18, L64, P52.
Defence is one of the key strategic areas of concern for any country. The ever increasing geopolitical risks are compelling nations to strengthen their defence capabilities. As a result, military expenditure is rising across the globe. This paper is a modest attempt to analyze the pattern of military spending across select countries and its effect on arms trade by them. The result of the t-test of the mean difference showed a significant difference in the average military burden of select countries over the period from 1989 to 2019. The analysis revealed that an upward trend in military expenditure (MILEX) in a developed country like the United States is aimed at acquiring superiority in weapon production. In contrast, China, India, and Israel spend more on the military to enhance their deterrence from threats imposed by neighboring countries and civil wars. However, the military expenditure in Japan followed a consistent pattern since 1990. It was suggested that the Indian defence industry should emphasize indigenization by enhancing the participation of foreign investors and the private sector than escalating military expenditure.
Indian Journal of Economics and Development
Volume 16 No. 2, 2020, 196-207
Indexed in Clarivate Analytics (ESCI) of WoS
Manpreet Kaur1, P.J.S. Pannu2, and Vikas Nath3
1Associate Professor, 2Research Scholar, and Director, Bharati Vidyapeeth Institute of Management and Research, A-4, Paschim Vihar, Rohtak Road, New Delhi-110063
Corresponding author’s email: email@example.com